Distinguish sections by content
Mark where a new question begins. Instructions may contain preparation, action and checking; a service page may explain scope, prerequisites and the next step. These are examples rather than a compulsory template. Two neighbouring sections answering the same question may belong together.
Phrase headings so their differences are apparent. Several sections called “Further information” offer little help when scanning. A concrete heading such as “Which documents should be available” explains the following content without repeating the entire paragraph. After renaming, check whether the text fulfils that promise.
Separate hierarchy from appearance
A subquestion belongs beneath its parent section rather than at the same level as that whole subject. Have the technical heading structure marked accordingly. W3C describes headings as a way to organize content, with levels reflecting that structure. Exact font size is a separate design decision.
Do not choose a deeper heading level merely because it looks smaller in the current design. If styling is unsuitable, adjust it around the correct structure. Otherwise the page may look orderly while its technical outline says something different.
Review reading flow afterwards
Read headings alone in order, then the full text. The first view reveals topic sequence; the second shows whether transitions and paragraphs still flow naturally. Every short paragraph does not need a heading. Excessive division can unnecessarily fragment one connected explanation.
Check long headings on small screens. Wrapping is acceptable; clipped words or overlapping elements are different problems. Assess each translated version separately because length and sentence structure can vary. Document the content hierarchy rather than adding a visible contents list when the page does not need one.
